The Choice Database is designed to track decisions that affect quests, NPC relationships, faction outcomes, rewards, Orbtopia, and possible story branches.
Because Sea of Remnants is still pre-release, this page defines the database format and separates verified outcomes from unconfirmed reports.
The choice database is designed for players who want to compare quest decisions, NPC reactions, and route outcomes. Sea of Remnants places unusual emphasis on choices shaping Orbtopia and the player's relationships with companions and factions. A simple list of quest names is not enough; each entry needs context, source status, and a clear distinction between immediate and delayed consequences.
A complete entry should include the quest or scene, the NPCs involved, the available options, the immediate result, any later result, rewards, faction changes, recruitment effects, and the version where the outcome was checked. This structure keeps the database useful without pretending that unverified routes are final.
| Field | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Quest or Scene | The point where the decision appears. |
| Option Text | The exact wording shown to the player. |
| Immediate Result | Dialogue, battle, reward, or route change visible right away. |
| Delayed Result | Anything that appears later in Orbtopia, a questline, or an NPC relationship. |
| Source Status | Official, verified in-game, community report, or unconfirmed. |
This format is intentionally strict. It helps readers see whether an entry is useful for planning or only a note that needs more evidence.
Some players use choice databases to avoid missing rewards. Others use them to understand character relationships or faction consequences. In Sea of Remnants, both approaches matter because the same decision may affect a crewmate, an NPC route, and Orbtopia's state. A good database should let players scan quickly, then open a detail page when they need spoilers.
The database should also avoid exaggerating consequences. If a decision only changes dialogue, that is still useful information. If a decision changes recruitment, reward access, or a later route, that should be highlighted more clearly. Ranking every choice as good or bad too early would be misleading before the final game data is stable.
No. The database is being prepared around public information and should expand with verified quest data.
Summary pages should stay readable, while detailed outcome pages can include clear spoiler headings.
Recruitment, faction effects, rewards, city changes, quest branches, and relationship outcomes are the strongest signals.
Yes, but they should be labeled and checked against screenshots, video, or repeated in-game verification.
This database structure is based on official choice-driven descriptions and common RPG wiki verification practices.